« Job description: What's going to happen? | Main | Waiting period »

Who's covering your hotel bill?

I wrote an entry on the blog of an outlet I often write for, breaking (I think) the news that a former U.S. champion had entered the Boston Marathon at the last minute. So far as I know, the news isn’t widely known elsewhere, because of the way the athlete entered the race.

Due to some poor management in the mid-80s, the Boston Marathon doesn’t take direct control of their own elite field. The elite athletes in Boston are signed and presented by marathon sponsor John Hancock; the B.A.A. is not involved with them, even to publicize the field, until very late in the process. I get my press releases from someone who isn’t the B.A.A.’s media coordinator. But when this athlete was taken on late, his hotel room is being covered by the B.A.A., not John Hancock. As a result, even though he would be part of the John Hancock program under ordinary circumstances, he’s “below the radar.” He’s not included in the “late additions” pages, nor is there biographical information readily available (though that might be due to the late nature of his entry—I actually wrote one of the more recent interviews with him.)

This is just an anomaly, but it highlights an interesting quirk about the marathon. And it’s a quirk that could become a problem under the right circumstances. John Hancock does not necessarily have the same interests in mind as the B.A.A. They’re not likely to be in conflict, but they may also not be doing the best possible job for the marathon.

This becomes interesting when you consider that John Hancock was bought out by a Canadian company last year, and recent rumblings have suggested that they may be asked to pull back some of their sports sponsorship commitments. One wonders how the Boston Marathon might change its position among the upper echelon of major marathons (currently defined, roughly, as Boston, New York, Chicago, and London, plus possibly Rotterdam, not necessarily in that order.)

Comments

My guess is Boston would have no problem picking up a major sponsor. Fidelity immediately comes to mind.

P, While it’s below the radar of many Americans, Fukuoka is certainly in that list, and Berlin may be. I’d say Rotterdam is more questionable.

Scooter - You might be right that Fukuoka may come before Rotterdam. And Berlin is - sometimes - up there. (Three world records in ten years is nothing to sneeze at.) But (a) Fukuoka suffers from not having a women’s field, and actually Osaka probably tops the second tier for women’s races, and (b) when the athlete’s contracts get written, and the race-victory bonuses get detailed, the big money is listed under Chicago, Boston, New York, and London, and the others we’ve mentioned come in the second list, with bonuses around 75% to 50% those of the first tier. Because when it comes to what sponsors care about, “Off the radar of Americans” means “Not as important.”

On a totally unrelated note, did I see you across a smoky bar at the RW party? I was damn near unable to move so I could not say Hi.

“And it’s a quirk that could become a problem under the right circumstances.”

It was a problem yesterday. It is a problem when the race’s second American (10th place overall) runs a huge breakthrough race and is then not invited to the post-race press conference because he isn’t one of the Hancock athletes. It is a problem when top American marathoners—regardless of how late they entered the field—aren’t publicized, but row after row of B-list Kenyans are marched out in the Friday press conference as a testament to the “depth of the field.” Unless there are significant changes in the way the Boston Marathon recruits and promotes its top athletes, it will continue to be a problem.

And you were at the RW party? I didn’t see you at all.

Samo, sounds like you’ve done some talking with Toni Reavis. Let’s just say that I have other issues with JH and their relationship with the BAA, but also don’t want to step on BAA toes.

We didn’t stay at the RW party very long. Too many people, too little space, and only adult beverages within reach. I saw most of the people I wanted to see (fewer every year), then we escaped.

Post a comment